疑難雜症萬事通
在網路上遇到任何問題都可以在這邊找找看唷

Search

關於 scientific credibility ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

相關標籤 相關照片 相關影片
在scientific credibility這個產品中，有3篇Facebook貼文，粉絲數超過28萬的網紅美國在台協會 AIT，也在其Facebook貼文中提到， 美國國務卿蓬佩奧新聞聲明：《台灣被排除在世界衛生大會之外》 「台灣被排除在世界衛生大會之外，美國予以強烈譴責。當世界正戮力對抗新冠疫情的同時，我們需要多邊機構履行其既定使命，並為所有會員國的利益服務，而不是在生命危在旦夕之際，仍在操弄政治。」 「…世界衛生組織秘書長譚德塞有法律授權，也可循先例，...
　同時也有10000部Youtube影片，追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル，也在其Youtube影片中提到，...

scientific credibility 在 美國在台協會 AIT Facebook 的精選貼文

美國在台協會 AIT By 美國在台協會 AIT

2020-05-19 13:37:33 有 4,893 人按讚
  • Share this:

美國國務卿蓬佩奧新聞聲明：《台灣被排除在世界衛生大會之外》

「台灣被排除在世界衛生大會之外，美國予以強烈譴責。當世界正戮力對抗新冠疫情的同時，我們需要多邊機構履行其既定使命，並為所有會員國的利益服務，而不是在生命危在旦夕之際，仍在操弄政治。」

「…世界衛生組織秘書長譚德塞有法律授權，也可循先例，將台灣納入世界衛生大會的各項會議及活動。然而譚德塞卻屈服於中國的壓力，選擇不邀請台灣參加。祕書長譚德塞缺乏中立，剝奪了世界衛生大會向台灣聽取防疫專業科學知識的機會，更在世界最需要世衛之際進一步損害了世界衛生組織的公信力及效能。」

新聞聲明全文中文：https://bit.ly/2AH3inW
新聞聲明全文英文：https://bit.ly/2Tz5iW3

"Taiwan’s Exclusion From the World Health Assembly" by Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State

“The United States condemns Taiwan’s exclusion from the World Health Assembly. At a time when the world continues to struggle with the COVID-19 pandemic, we need multilateral institutions to deliver on their stated missions and to serve the interests of all member states, not to play politics while lives are at stake.”

"...WHO’s Director-General Tedros had every legal power and precedent to include Taiwan in WHA’s proceedings. Yet, he instead chose not to invite Taiwan under pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Director-General’s lack of independence deprives the Assembly of Taiwan’s renowned scientific expertise on pandemic disease, and further damages the WHO’s credibility and effectiveness at a time when the world needs it the most.

The full text of the statement: https://bit.ly/2Tz5iW3

Tags:
美國在台協會 AIT

About author
本會臉書對於內容中連結至其他網站的資料，對其內容不負任何責任，也不代表對其內容的認可與核准。依規定美國在台協會無法在公開的論壇上討論個別申請問題。對於任何謾罵、攻擊或騷擾性的言論本會有權刪除及封鎖。
美國在台協會(American Institute in Taiwan, AIT)推廣美國人民與台灣人民之間的商務、文化及其他關係。官方網站: https://www.ait.org.tw/zhtw/our-relationship-zh/
276608 followers 255040 likes "https://www.ait.org.tw/"
View all posts

scientific credibility 在 MedPartner 美的好朋友 Facebook 的最佳貼文

MedPartner 美的好朋友 By MedPartner 美的好朋友

2020-05-18 22:54:37 有 8,485 人按讚
  • Share this:

精彩了，今天世衛外交戰這個聲明有夠兇，以正式的官方外交辭令來說，這真的是直接開噴的概念。美國國務院剛才發出公開聲明，譴責世衛譚德塞拒絕台灣的行為，是傷害了WHO自己的公信力，特別是全世界最需要這個公信力的時候。

這則聲明同時也譴責中國 #惡意（spiteful) 對世衛施壓，他們所說的透明、國際合作、公開根本就是空談，而且更顯示出台灣與中國之間的差距。

最後還說台灣是世界的模範公民，但中國卻是隱匿疫情起源的消息，屏蔽社群媒體有關的討論，而且到處亂罵人。

真的很派。基本上是從第一句幹譙到最後一句了。

“The Director-General’s lack of independence deprives the Assembly of Taiwan’s renowned scientific expertise on pandemic disease, and further damages the WHO’s credibility and effectiveness at a time when the world needs it the most.

The PRC’s spiteful action to silence Taiwan exposes the emptiness of its claims to want transparency and international cooperati to fight the pandemic, and makes the difference between China and Taiwan ever more stark.

Taiwan is a model world citizen, while the PRC continues to withhold vital information about the virus and its origins, deny access to their scientists and relevant facilities, censor discussion of the pandemic within China and on Chinese social media properties, and casts blame widely and recklessly."

原始連結：

https://www.state.gov/taiwans-exclusion-from-the-world-health-assembly/

Tags:
MedPartner 美的好朋友

About author
Med，是Medicine，醫學的縮寫。Med 唸起來也是「美的」。我們希望用醫學專業，分享更多美的知識。Partner則是我們對彼此關係的想像。我們認為醫師和求診者不只是醫病關係，更應該是夥伴關係。 如果您也認同我們的理想，歡迎和我們一起傳播更多正確的醫美知識。 我們的內容製作，完全由MedPartner專業醫療團隊負責，拒絕任何業配。 contact us: [email protected]
MedPartner 美的好朋友 www.medpartner.club 一群專業醫師、藥師、營養師、化妝品配方師，希望透過實證科學精神，努力分享最正確的健康、美容、保養相關資訊。歡迎加入Line@好友，可享跟醫師線上
301737 followers 280366 likes "http://www.medpartner.club/"
View all posts

scientific credibility 在 元毓 Facebook 的精選貼文

元毓 By 元毓

2019-06-23 13:39:12 有 161 人按讚
  • Share this:


根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

Tags:
元毓

About author
元毓說粉絲頁 美國法學碩士，智財權、競爭法與法律經濟分析專業。分享20年投資經驗所得之經濟學體悟。
7451 followers 5623 likes "http://yuanyu.idv.tw/"
View all posts

scientific credibility 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答

コバにゃんチャンネル By コバにゃんチャンネル

2021-10-01 13:19:08 有 9 人看過 有 1 人喜歡
  • Share this:

post-title
コバにゃんチャンネル

About author
コバにゃん☆です?
2910 subscribers viewes
View all posts

scientific credibility 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文

大象中醫 By 大象中醫

2021-10-01 13:10:45 有 0 人看過 有 0 人喜歡
  • Share this:

post-title
大象中醫

About author
長照是一個劇變的旋轉舞台 百年難得一見 沒有準備的人 被旋轉舞台甩出去 不是坐下就是躺下 而大象中醫是太極的推手 推動著旋轉舞台 讓 所有爬不起來的人 背後有一股推手力量 支撐再站起來
1310 subscribers viewes
View all posts

scientific credibility 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文

大象中醫 By 大象中醫

2021-10-01 13:09:56 有 0 人看過 有 0 人喜歡
  • Share this:

post-title
大象中醫

About author
長照是一個劇變的旋轉舞台 百年難得一見 沒有準備的人 被旋轉舞台甩出去 不是坐下就是躺下 而大象中醫是太極的推手 推動著旋轉舞台 讓 所有爬不起來的人 背後有一股推手力量 支撐再站起來
1310 subscribers viewes
View all posts
社群媒體上有些相關的討論：

scientific credibility 在 Scientific Credibility in a Post-Pandemic World - YouTube 的推薦與評價

影片讀取中

This panel discussion will examine credibility in science in two ways: ... Especially in the wake of the Covid pandemic in which science and ... ... <看更多>

你可能也想看看
scientific credibility psychology
scientific credible definition
information credibility
搜尋相關連結

#1. Scientific credibility and reproducibility

Credibility is everything for science, and it is built over time in both obvious and subtle ways. It is how we interact with colleagues and ...

#2. Scientific credibility definition and meaning

Scientific credibility definition: If someone or something has credibility , people believe in them and trust them. [...] | Meaning, pronunciation ...

#3. Scientific credibility: is it who you are, or how you do it?

Scientists (and other consumers of scientific claims) do take into account the identities of the scientists putting forward scientific claims ...

#4. Credibility of scientific information on social media

Credibility is understood as a subjective feature that is perceived by individual readers and not an innate feature of the information (Bian, 2012; Schmierbach ...

#5. Confidence in Research – Scientific Credibility in a Post ...

This Falling Walls Circle Round Table Panel Discussion examines scientific credibility. What makes science credible ?

#6. Evaluating Credibility - Biology - Research Basics

Evaluating the credibility of data is an important part of scientific scholarship. If data is not correctly collected or analyzed ...

#7. Strengthening scientific credibility against misinformation ...

Strengthening scientific credibility against misinformation and disinformation: Where do we stand now? · Authors · Affiliations.

#8. How do we solve science's 'credibility problem'?

Science is considered a source of truth and the importance of its role in shaping modern society cannot be overstated.

#9. How do the vectors of scientific credibility reconfigure at ...

How do scientists make credible, in the eyes of their peers, their institutions and their funders, the activities they develop with or for actors of the socio- ...

#10. The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific ...

In conclusion, our results strongly suggest that scientific authority is generally considered a reliable source for truth, more so than ...

#11. Scientific credibility - List of Frontiers' open access articles

This page contains Frontiers open-access articles about Scientific credibility.

#12. Strengthening scientific credibility in the face of ...

Perspectives. Strengthening scientific credibility in the face of misinformation and disinformation: Viable solutions☆ · Abstract · Introduction · Section ...

#13. Science, Advocacy, and Credibility

Credibility is a basic coin of science, and while scientists have every right to be avid supporters of whatever cause, they should not expect to be taken as ...

#14. Political endorsements can affect scientific credibility

Political endorsements can affect scientific credibility. In 2020, Nature endorsed Joe Biden in the US presidential election.

#15. Strengthening scientific credibility in the face of ...

Health scientists and healthcare professionals are cautious about disseminating unsubstantiated findings, and credible health information is often nuanced, ...

#16. scientific credibility - 英中– Linguee词典

大量翻译例句关于"scientific credibility" – 英中词典以及8百万条中文译文例句搜索。

#17. Determining the Credibility of Science Communication

There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible – e.g. that claims are not made without ...

#18. Credibility in Science and the Press

Credibility in Science and the Press. Daniel E. Koshland, Jr.Authors Info & Affiliations. Science. 1 Nov 1991. Vol 254, Issue 5032.

#19. A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Papers

Computer Science > Computation and Language. arXiv:2106.15195 (cs). [Submitted on 29 Jun 2021]. Title:Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation ...

#20. When is science credible?

To determine credibility, scientific studies need to be assessed along (at least) the following three dimensions: (1) method and data ...

#21. Scientific Credibility in a Post-Pandemic World - YouTube

This panel discussion will examine credibility in science in two ways: ... Especially in the wake of the Covid pandemic in which science and ...

#22. The Scientific Credibility of Folk Psychology

書名：The Scientific Credibility of Folk Psychology，語言：英文，ISBN：0805815716，頁數：128，作者：Fletcher, Garth J. O.，出版日期：1995/09/01， ...

#23. Leveraging scientific credibility about Arctic sea ice trends ...

Because the overall credibility of science and scientists is higher than that of many communities (27), with only military leaders eliciting ...

#24. Credibility - Wikipedia

Scientific credibility has been defined as the extent to which science in general is recognized as a source of reliable information about the world.

#25. The Scientific Credibility of ESP - Samuel Moss, Donald C ...

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975, 11, 166–170. Crossref · ISI · Google Scholar. McConnell R. A. ESP and credibility in science. American ...

#26. ESP and credibility in science. - APA PsycNet

Places the ESP controversy in an epistemological context. The possibility of hoaxes is discussed and the distinction between legal and scientific proof ...

#27. Li | Communicating data: interactive infographics, scientific ...

Information visualization could be used to leverage the credibility of displayed scientific data. However, little was known about how ...

#28. Scientific Credibility - Encyclopedia

Get the latest Scientific Credibility research reviews, science news & scholar articles. View the most complete encyclopedia by Academic Accelerator.

#29. Does Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of ...

It is often assumed that issue advocacy will compromise the credibility of scientists. We conducted a randomized controlled experiment to ...

#30. What makes a scientific article credible? A look at peer ...

Click here to learn the three easy tricks for recognizing credible journal publications and articles.

#31. Why can we trust the information produced by scientific ...

Science is the best way we know to develop reliable knowledge. ... Scientific research is both an individual and a collective activity.

#32. The Scientific Credibility of Commonsense Psychology

By the early 1980s, the idea that ordinary human social cognition is rational or scientific in character was under serious attack in personality and social ...

#33. Why do we (dis)trust? A look at the science of credibility

Timothy Caulfield uses for messages that use legitimate science to promote false or misleading claims. A Canada Research Chair in Health Law and ...

#34. Scientists carry greater credibility than spiritual gurus

What influence does the source of information have on its credibility? Scientists have more authority than spiritual sources, ...

#35. scientific credibility

[From the abstract of the paper, “A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings”, by Etienne LeBel, Randy McCarthy, Brian Earp, ...

#36. Facing the challenges of science communication 2.0: quality ...

Are they entirely new or rather occurring in a different communicative context of longstanding issues pertaining to the credibility and ...

#37. Credibility, Commercial Research, and Open Science

We explore the importance of Open Science practices in enabling digital therapeutic companies to provide products backed by the highest credibility of ...

#38. Why do so many Americans distrust science?

Medical science faces a credibility crisis that threatens its ability to protect health. Scientists need to grasp the forces sowing ...

#39. Credibility in Scientific Machine Learning: Data Verification ...

Credibility in Scientific Machine Learning: Data Verification and Model Qualification. The Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) initiative on Advanced ...

#40. The Importance of Scientific Transparency and ...

In scientific research, credibility is of utmost importance. Data documentation and storage, and the “rigor, transparency, and attention we ...

#41. The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy ...

Amazon.com: The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy: 9780231062152: Fisher, Seymour, Greenberg, Roger: Books.

#42. Values and Credibility in Science Communication

Values and Credibility in Science Communication ... Some have proposed “guiding principles for communicating scientific findings” to promote trust and ...

#43. Credibility evaluation of scientific information on websites

PDF | The present study aimed to develop a literature-based and expert-modified model for credibility evaluation of scientific web information in order.

#44. Scientific credibility is at an all-time low — and scientists ...

The National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine (NASEM), at the behest of Congress, is convening a new panel to revamp the dietary ...

#45. Credibility News, Articles

credibility. Retractions Damage Scientists' Reputations: Study. Aggie Mika | Sep 8, 2017 | 2 min read. Authors of rescinded papers see a 10 percent to 20 ...

#46. THE CREDIBILITY OF SCIENTIFIC WRITING: AN APPEAL ...

The world of scientific publishing is evolving rapidly. Alongside the usual “big sharks”—the monopolistic publishing houses that have been ...

#47. Scientists Carry Greater Credibility Than Spiritual Gurus

Both the majority of religious and non-religious people consider information provided by scientists to be more credible and reliable than ...

#48. The Scientific Creed and the Credibility Crunch for ...

by Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D; biologist and author of Science Set Free. The “scientific worldview” is immensely influential because the sciences have been so ...

#49. What makes a scientific study legitimate/credible/reliable?

Scientific research follows accepted standards and practices, and is often subject to peer review (that ... That adds legitimacy and credibility as well.

#50. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

Enhancing scientific credibility: An open science strategy for the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology. SA j. ind. Psychol. [online].

#51. Why Carl Sagan is Truly Irreplaceable | Science

Sagan was the most famous scientist in America—the face of science itself. ... They saw Sagan as the gatekeeper of scientific credibility.

#52. What Makes Science Trustworthy

The “scientific method” of high school textbooks does not exist. ... scientists were no more credible than those maintained by anyone else.

#53. Credibility of Science Communication - An Exploratory ...

Credibility of Science Communication. An Exploratory Study of Press Releases in Astronomy. Lars Holm Nielsen Nanna Torpe Jørgensen Kim Jantzen Sanne Bjerg

#54. Research on the reliability and credibility of scientific ...

Research on the reliability and credibility of scientific research sparks major debate. Research co-led by Dr Eike Rinke, has triggered ...

#55. Components of Credibility for Science/Resource ...

“professional credibility,” defined as “not only scientific knowledge and abilities, but also contri- butions to science and scientific endeavors which are ...

#56. Multidisciplinary expert scientific advisory group (MESAG)

... on the scientific credibility of the GEO process. In order to perform these important functions, the Multidisciplinary Expert Scientific Advisory Group ...

#57. Scientific Resource Center - Effective Health Care Program

Scientific Resource Center · Providing scientific and technical support to protect the scientific credibility and independence of EHC Program products.

#58. The Most Popular Health Articles of 2018, a Scientific ...

As explained above, credibility for the top 100 articles was assessed by Health Feedback's science editors instead of clinicians and scientists ...

#59. Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal ...

Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and. Various Misdemeanors. ARTHUR G. BEDEIAN. Louisiana State University. SHANNON G. TAYLOR.

#60. TED Science Standards | Our policies + terms

First and foremost, that information has to be scientifically credible. The scientific method. Science isn't a set of truths written in stone. It's an approach ...

#61. Promoting "Credibility Revolution": Journey to Open Science

Promoting "Credibility Revolution": Journey to Open Science. Collaboration, transparency, and mass mobilizing to improve current practices.

#62. Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers

However, preprints can only accelerate scientific discovery if others are willing to judge them as credible, i.e. legitimate research ...

#63. Exploring the Role of Trust and Credibility in Science ...

The 6th ISU Summer Symposium on Science Communication was held at Iowa State. University from June 7 to 9, 2018. Hosting this biennial symposium series is a ...

#64. Do We Want to Be Credible or Incredible?

Psychological science is at a crossroads. The replicability crisis has turned into a credibility revolution. Many professional societies and ...

#65. Expert credibility in climate change

scientists indicate striking agreement with the primary conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (IPCC): anthropogenic greenhouse gases ...

#66. The credibility of scientific communication sources regarding ...

The credibility of scientific communication sources regarding climate change: A population-based survey experiment. Luis Sanz-Menéndez and Laura Cruz-Castro.

#67. Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming

Partial list of leading scientific organizations endorsing human-induced ... W. R. L. Anderegg, “Expert Credibility in Climate Change”, Proceedings of the ...

#68. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific ...

Primary outcomes were trust in science and scientists (21-item scale) and 4 individual items related to trust and credibility; 9 additional ...

#69. Cultural Boundaries of Science

Why is science so credible? Usual answers center on scientists' objective methods or their powerful instruments. In his new book, Thomas Gieryn argues that ...

#70. Educational Leadership Researchers, (Social) Scientific ...

Educational Leadership Researchers, (Social) Scientific Credibility, and the Kardashian Index. 9 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2018. See all articles by Scott Eacott ...

#71. Theory and Credibility

Theory and Credibility: Integrating Theoretical and Empirical Social Science ... the credibility revolution and formal theory can advance social scientific ...

#72. Adding a personal backstory could boost your scientific ...

Two science communicators explain how researchers who present ... personal backstory could boost your scientific credibility with the public.

#73. Assessing credibility and representations of science

Skepticism and defiance: Assessing credibility and representations of science. Jean Louis Tavani, Anthony Piermattéo, Grégory Lo Monaco, ...

#74. Theory, ideology and IR's quest for scientific credibility | 5 | Theor

This chapter approaches the problem of theory from a sociology of scientific knowledge perspective and enquires into the roles the designation theory plays ...

#75. Safeguarding the Credibility of Population Health Science ...

Recently, scientific credibility has also been undermined by political conflict over COVID-19 precautions and the infodemic of conflicting information on social ...

#76. Communicating uncertainty about climate change

Stanford research shows how uncertainty in scientific predictions can help and harm credibility. The ways climate scientists explain their ...

#77. Study Retracted from Major Scientific Journal Raises ...

Learn how the retraction of a study from a major scientific journal made members of the scientific community question methods used to verify credibility ...

#78. Assessing Children's Credibility: Scientific and Legal Issues in ...

admission of expert scientific evidence developed by the United States. Supreme Court.' II. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM. A. RAPID GROWTH IN CHILD ABUSE ALLEGATIONS.

#79. Science-based approach for credible accounting of mitigation ...

The credibility and effectiveness of country climate targets under the Paris Agreement requires that, in all greenhouse gas (GHG) sectors, ...

#80. General Information/Peer Review

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is committed to applying rigorous scientific standards to ensure the accuracy and reliability of ...

#81. Researchers' Scientific Credibility and Knowledge Transfer

Researchers' Scientific Credibility and Knowledge Transfer. A Credibilidade Científica do Investigador e a Transferência do Conhecimento.

#82. A Framework for Federal Scientific Integrity Policy and ...

relevant, credible, and objective science to guide Federal agency decision-making. • Scientific integrity policies consistently and fully implemented across.

#83. Insight into the scientific credibility of The Guardian climate ...

Over the past two months, Climate Feedback has asked its network of scientists to review 5 widely read articles published by The Guardian.

#84. Ensuring Scientific Publishing Credibility in Translational ...

However, the academic stature of this field can be damaged by weaknesses in scientific publishing, where a “credibility crisis” has emerged ...

#85. credibility, authority and validity in biodiversity citizen ...

Thousands of examining eyes: credibility, authority and validity in biodiversity citizen science data production - Author: Björn Ekström.

#86. Debating the scientific credibility of ...

professional development of psychologists and advance science, but also to foster ... Debating the scientific credibility of industrial.

#87. The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy

... who wrote to Freud to cheer him with the news that he had been able to find scientific laboratory support for one of his major ideas , was chagrined to ...

#88. Two-sided science: Communicating scientific uncertainty ...

Previous research on uncertainty communication has investigated its effects on both trust, and on the more extensive concept of credibility – ...

#89. Political endorsements can affect scientific credibility

Downloadable (with restrictions)! In 2020, Nature endorsed Joe Biden in the US presidential election. A survey finds that viewing the endorsement did not ...

#90. Salience, Credibility and Legitimacy in a Rapidly Shifting ...

... themes of salience, credibility, and legitimacy, sustainability science, ... credibility of science itself, not just particular scientific endeavors, ...

#91. compatibility of fishers and scientific surveys - Oxford Academic

The compatibility of fishers and scientific surveys: increasing legitimacy without jeopardizing credibility. Ingeborg J de Boois,.

#92. Race, gender of scientists affect perception of credibility

Ideology is a key factor in determining how people assess the credibility of scientific researchers, according to a new study.

#93. Assessing Journal Credibility | Emory Libraries

The credibility of a journal may be assessed by examining several key factors: Where is it indexed? Is the journal included or indexed in the major ...

#94. Scientific Credibility and Technical Standards in 19th and ...

The German community of scientists and electrotechnologists embraced the ... weight of objects in everyday life; the ohm derived from a scientific theory.

#95. Do Scientists Lose Credibility When They Become Political?

Indeed, surveys have repeatedly shown that scientists are among the most trusted groups in America—a standing that gives them some leeway to ...

#96. Can Transparency Equal Trust in Science's Crisis of ...

This has hit scientific credibility and prompted researchers to create new measures in order to maintain the quality of academic research ...

#97. Americans' Trust in Scientists, Other Groups Declines

Trust in scientists and medical scientists has fallen below pre-pandemic levels, with 29% of U.S. adults saying they have a great deal of ...

#98. The scientific credibility of anthroposophy

www.rosejourn.com. RoSE - Research on Steiner Education Vol.2 No.2 2011. ISSN 1891-6511 (online). The scientific credibility of anthroposophy. Jost Schieren.